Posted by: sweeneyblog | December 4, 2013

Gov. Inslee’s Green Efforts Depend on Whatcom Electeds

While gearing up for my 2014 legislative coverage, I decided to check in on some of the unresolved efforts from 2013. One of those is Governor Inslee’s climate change initiative.

Gov. Jay Inslee

Gov. Jay Inslee

As a congressman, Governor Inslee was relentless in his support for green energy and his efforts to combat climate change. In the runup to his election in 2012, the national media speculated whether he would transform Washington into a giant carbon scrubbing machine or maybe install huge solar panels across the entire east side of the state.

However, the Democrats tragically and suddenly lost control of the State Senate thanks to a pair of Democratic turncoats, allowing the Republicans to block legislation and gut environmental efforts. Instrumental to this effort to block the governor’s agenda was the new chair of the Energy, Environment and Telecommunications committee, Sen. Doug Ericksen (R-42). You can read my review of his efforts to co-opt then weaken environmental protections here.

While Ericksen did make some headlines last year for his ethical troubles and his rule-breaking activities as committee chair, he did have a significant impact on the governor’s legislative agenda, much to the frustration of fellow committee member, Sen. Kevin Ranker (D-40).

Ericksen and Ranker

Ericksen and Ranker

After much wrangling, the governor was able to secure one piece of environmental legislation. The formation of a committee to “recommend a state program of actions and policies to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.” Yes, another committee is not exactly thrilling, but I suspect the governor was looking ahead to the next three years of his term and was willing to wait for a more democratic legislature before pushing major reforms.

This committee, aptly titled the Climate Legislative and Executive Workgroup (as in, get a CLEW?), is composed of two Democrats, two Republicans and Governor Inslee, and you will never guess who is on that committee:

Sen. Ericksen and Sen. Ranker. 

Their on again/off again relationship was covered in this article by Ralph Schwartz in the Bellingham Herald, but now the future of the governor’s environmental agenda remains in their hands. The group met several times since the legislature adjourned and you can read a summary of their latest proposals here.

Skip down to page six to see the different proposals on the table. For example, Sen. Ranker proposed providing incentives and infrastructure investment to encourage energy companies to reduce their use of coal, as well as a carbon tax or cap and trade system. By comparison, Sen. Ericksen proposed shifting our energy production from coal to nuclear energy since that produces less carbon emissions.

I spoke to Sen. Ranker about CLEW’s work last week.  “Whatever comes out of (CLEW), it is imperative that we confront the growing challenge of climate change. It is one of the defining issues of our generation and what we do will have a lasting impact, not just on the health of Washington state but on the world at large.” The proposals from CLEW will be added to the growing pile of essential bills to be debated in 2014, such as a transportation package, funding education, gun control and the annual struggle over the budget.

Obviously, this year’s County Council races drew national attention but it might be the efforts of two Whatcom County senators that result in making Washington state a pioneer in environmental protection. Will CLEW result in ground-breaking environmental reforms and investment or will it return empty-handed to the state legislature? Stay tuned to our 2014 legislative coverage to find out.



  1. Excellent reporting Riley! You have a knack for breaking down the wordy issues and making the article easy to read and understand. Thank you for that.
    I hope Kevin Ranker can succeed in his efforts, or I fear our environment and our children’s future with this planet will surely suffer for our mistakes.

  2. Tonight, Doug kicked off his 2014 reelection campaign. I wasn’t able to attend since the League of Women Voters was sponsoring its annual chance to talk with elected officials at the YWCA. So much for the hopes that he would give up his seat to run against Susan DelBene. Your headline interested me. While I consider Doug to be a Whatcom County elected, I have never considered Kevin who represents the three-county 40th District to be so. To me, while I am glad to have him as my State Senator, I consider him more a San Juan elected. I hope you have more than gridlock to report on this year.

    • So do I, gridlock is lousy for news and even worse for the state. By the way, the laws about transferring funds from a state senator election effort to a congressional effort are very generous and Ericksen would have no trouble switching races.

  3. […] Democrats including Sen. Ranker, two Republicans including Sen. Ericksen and Gov. Inslee) hold the fate of Inslee’s climate change efforts in their hands. So how is it going? Not […]

  4. […] suspect many negotiators on both sides of the aisle where waiting to see if 2014 would return control of the State Senate to democratic hands, but the flying fickle finger of fate (yes, a Laugh-In reference in a millennial blog, deal with […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: