Posted by: sweeneyblog | November 7, 2013

You thought 2013 was nuts? Wait till next year!

As the 2013 election season winds down (yes, we are still waiting to see how the Port races turnout, but looking ahead), the groundwork is already being laid for the wild ride of 2014. Let’s take a look

Gary Jensen with Suzan Delbene in 2012

Gary Jensen with Suzan Delbene in 2012

Whatcom County will be ground zero, once again, for two races with state and national consequence. Freshman Rep. Suzan DelBene will be up for her first reelection election campaign since she bested Koster for the newly redrawn 1st Congressional district. Since being elected, she has carved out an impressive niche in the last year, using her technological expertise to push for oversight on the NSA and her position on the House Agricultural Committee to lobby for our farming community. As a first-time Representative in a swing-ish district, this race could attract national attention.

With her rather subtly progressive voting record, I doubt she will face any trouble on the left. The question is who will run against her on the right? Obviously, my first choice is State Sen. Doug Ericksen. I realize that a congressional race will cut into his dining with lobbyists, but I think he has a shot.

Doug Ericksen for Congress

If he goes for it, it could be a competitive race. Alternately, the Republicans could recruit some King County moderate businessperson to run against her, but as Rob McKenna and Susan Hutchison proved, Washington State doesn’t really buy into that sort of thing.

The other race that will definitely draw some attention is the State Senate race in the 42nd. That’s right, Doug Ericksen could be at the center of both these races, making 2014 officially “The Year of the Doug”. Provided Sen. Ericksen decides to run for reelection, he will still be in the crosshairs. With the balance of the State Senate hanging by a thread, the 42nd legislative district (north Bellingham to the Canadian border) is now considered a swing district.

In 2012, Natalie McClendon and Matt Krogh made a noble attempt to unseat Rep. Vincent Buys and Rep. Jason Overstreet and despite the Republicans rather extreme record in the state legislature, neither one was able to come close to unseating the incumbents. But with the state-wide parties flowing money into our community, combined with a repeat of the effective ground game the Democrats ran this year, this could be a real close fight.

The only other race of note in 2014 on a local level is our County Prosecutor. David McEachran  has served as County Prosecutor for the last four decades. Let that sink in for a moment. When he was first elected, Time Magazine had declared Richard Nixon their “Person of the Year”, a stamp cost $0.08 and ATARI had just invented Pong, the first modern computer game. In that time, he has rarely drawn an opponent much less a competitive race. Sources within the Prosecutor’s office indicate that he will run for reelection and has no plans for retiring in 2014.

There may be an initiative requiring mandatory background checks on all gun sales on the ballot and there is rumbling of perhaps more $15 minimum wage efforts throughout the state. As I get more information on these efforts or potential candidates for next year, I will let you know. You can always send your tips to me by clicking here.

Advertisements

Responses

  1. Interesting to note that Yes on I-522 is ahead in only three counties: Whatcom, King, and Jefferson.

    • Interesting to know that people aren’t concerned with what they eat or feed their children.

    • san juan also

  2. Something missing? “As a first-time Representative in a swing-ish district, this race could attract……..”

    Another possibility is a ballot issue from Move to Amend.

    Thanks for all you do to keep us informed on what’s behind the headlines, Riley.

    • Thank you! In the editing process, I lost a few words.

  3. We really need to get someone viable to run against McEachran. His office was part of the reason we were noncompliant with the GMA. His council attorney refuses to discuss anything on the record, even though this goes far beyond the scope of an appropriate exemption to open public meetings. His handling of the council mike-chek was biased and selective. From what I know, he is focused on the criminal side and does not put enough resources into civil matters. And it is just not a good idea to have one person in charge of legal policy for such a long time.

  4. […] all the flurry over curious Port results, Doug Ericksen for Congress and my all-male Odds and Ends last week, the recent activity on the jail almost went unnoticed. […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: