Posted by: sweeneyblog | February 19, 2012

Dispatch from Rep. Overstreet’s Town Hall Meeting

Rep. Overstreet dominated the town hall meeting he hosted with Rep. Buys and Sen. Ericksen. Commanding the center stage, he answered the most questions and acted as the middle ground between Rep. Buys peppy optimism and Sen. Ericksen’s disdainful grimace at each question. Actually, you know what, rather than doing a straight report, let me just cut to the chase here in helpful bullet form.

The Basics: Just shy of 70 people attended the forum. Sheriff Elfo, and Mayor of Lynden Scott Korthuis, were in attendance. The public officials spoke for about twenty minutes before opening it up for questions. Most of the questions fell into two categories, “Why are you cutting (education, support for the deaf, teacher pensions)?”, and “Thank you for all that you do. Give ’em hell!” Sen. Ericksen rolled his eyes on more than one occasion to the first category of questions and Buys visibly brightened at each of the second.

The Shockingly: Doug Ericksen managed to make it through an entire town hall meeting without threatening any journalists with arrest. Unlike last year.

The Positive: The only time anyone applauded was when Jason Overstreet made a point about limiting the federal authority concerning indefinite detention of American citizens. He spoke about opposing Obama’s recent encroachment on our civil liberties and got a nice round of applause.

The Negative: I had an opportunity to ask Rep. Overstreet about his recent bill that would allow people to pay debt with gold coins. My question for Rep. Overstreet was, “How many jobs does paying bills with gold coins create?” Without missing a beat, Rep. Overstreet said, “Good question.” He expounded about how this bill would bring our laws in line with an obscure provision in the Constitution (Article 1, Section 10, which forbids that any state  “make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts”)  He said that allowing people to pay in gold “restores confidence in our economy.” Nowhere in his answer did he ever refer to “Jobs”.

The Bat-Shit Crazy: One audience member, who blew me off when I tried to contact him for a follow-up, asked this question, “What are you going to do about this law where someone can marry a building, are we going to have a referendum?” Rep. Buys tried to shift it, “I think you are asking about the same-sex marriage law . . .”  But the audience member continued, “But the law allows people to marry buildings if they want to.” Overstreet stepped in and said, “Well, it will be put up to a referendum, and we will see.”

The Predictable: Sen. Ericksen expressed his desire to liquidate public lands and state parks to make up our state deficit. Overstreet expressed a general fear that “Society is coming apart at the seams. We’re losing it folks, read article one of the Constitution!” Ericksen and Overstreet both said that “The Dept. of Ecology is completely out of control!”  Overstreet stressed the cultural differences between “those in Olympia, who want to charge BP ‘a million dollars here, a million dollars there’ and those hard-working people in Whatcom County, struggling to survive.” Overstreet took a swing at Rep. Hague, accusing her of removing education as the top priority for our state.

The Vaguely Surprising: Rep. Buys, in response to a question on single-payer health care, he expressed his support for allowing private insurers to offer their services as a menu for people to choose from in some sort of exchange or market. Ericksen, probably noting that this sounded suspiciously similar to the Affordable Care Act, jumped in and quickly changed the subject to a voucher program.

Conclusion: Honestly, I was a little dispirited. It seemed to me that the only person that was truly listening to each of the questions from the audience was Rep. Buys and the other two didn’t let him say much. None of the representatives offered any new information, just general rehashes of their campaign speeches from two years ago. In short, everyone was just walking through the paces.

P.S. You can support the good work we are doing here at The Political Junkie by clicking here. Your contribution means a tank of gas out to an event, resources for a public records request, or better equipment for pictures and videos.



  1. I don’t know if you have seen this yet, but this is the story about a woman “marrying” a building.

  2. I looked at the link. The building marriage was made in January, well before the marriage equity bill was signed into law.

    Just sayin’.

  3. Nice coverage. I tried to make myself want to go, but just…couldn’t. Thanks for rogue journalists such as yourself!

  4. I saw some guy trying to marry a Jack In The Box cheeseburger on teevee a few nights ago, so the threat is very VERY real. When satire becomes policy, policy becomes satire. We must protect the sanctity of cheeseburgers.

  5. You must be mistaken,
    Ericksen wasn’t rolling his eyes,
    that’s was his brain reacting to a massive cognitive dissonance between what he thinks he’s heard himself saying
    and what he actually sees himself doing.
    The ears try and pull the eyes into the skull for protection and a time-out.
    the guy was marrying the bacon in the cheeseburger
    and not the cheeseburger itself because that would obviously be perverted.

    • Not a bad theory, I’ll have to watch for it.

    • rubie, thanks for correcting Tim about marrying the bacon and not the cheeseburger. Unfortunately, it’s polygamy either way as the man was explaining to his wife about his plans to marry the bacon. I don’t think it’s legal to be married to a woman and bacon at the same time.

      • As the exceptional observer I imagine myself to be
        I must correct your misapprehension – he was explaining his wedding plans to his mother who was naturally excited about her prospects for tiny little grandbacons.
        Why she didn’t scoff at the news is testament to a Mother’s Love of her Children under all circumstances.

  6. […] appeared on The Joe Show earlier this week, check it out here for my take on Jason Overstreet‘s Leprechaun Economics, and Mitt Romney‘s white erase […]

  7. […] You might remember Jason Overstreet as the Representative who tried to pass a law allowing you to pay all your bills with gold coins. Leprechaun economics aside, his seat partner is Vincent Buys, who recently made news by having one […]

  8. […] and current business owner Natalie McClendon faced off against Republican state representative and gold enthusiast Jason Overstreet. Similarly, drinking water watchdog and Democrat Matt Krogh went toe-to-toe with […]

  9. […] election turnout will be something similar to 2006 or 2008. What does that mean? It means if I was Rep. Jason Overstreet, or Rep. Vincent Buys I would be looking over my […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: