Posted by: sweeneyblog | September 26, 2014

Friday Odds and Ends: Panic, Preparation and Public Access

Hello Loyal Readers,

We are counting down to the final month of campaign season so prepare for the barrage of flyers, television ads and ridiculous accusations. As always, I will help you sort out the verifiable from the conjecture. Which brings us to our first Odd and End:

According to the Whatcom Republicans - this is Freddy Kruger

According to the Whatcom Republicans – this is Freddy Krueger

Whatcom Republicans are in full-panic mode over the potential involvement of Tom Steyer in the 42nd. Tom Steyer donated several thousand dollars to Washington Conservation Voters last year and some of that money was spent as independent expenditures in the County Council races. But as I pointed out after the Democratic sweep last year, it was not the glossy WCV mailers that won that race but the efficient and well-organized ground game that turned out voters in South Bellingham. One would hope that that the County Republicans “screw their courage to the sticking-place” and try doing some voter outreach for a change.

In the other Washington, Attorney General Eric Holder is preparing to leave the White House and the top rumored prospect for his replacement is from our home turf. U.S. Attorney Jenny Durkan from Seattle is on the short list to replace Holder. Durkan made headlines in the last couple of years cleaning house with the Seattle Police Department, pushing for vigorous reforms. She has been a leader on cyber sercurity reforms, and helped unravel a terrorist plot to blow up a military recruiting office in Seattle. She is also a lesbian – I mention this last because it is the least important part of her resume but would be one of the more higher profile LGBT appointments in the history of the United States.

Finally, my hometown of Olympia is celebrating the upgrade of their public access station, which just completed the conversion to High Definition. Using the funds provided by Comcast for a separate public access station, Thurston Community Television (TCTV) has been providing opportunities for locals to produce high quality television, gaining vital technical skills and documenting their communities growth for over twenty years.

Unlike the proposal by the Mayor of Bellingham which tethers our public access to a city-run television station, TCTV is a free-standing non-profit, allowing the organization the flexibility to charge membership dues, conduct fundraising and grow from a single broadcast channel to four station sharing content from around the community. Perhaps TCTV’s continued success will be a role model as we develop our video capabilities as a community.

The weather has finally returned to normal, leaving plenty of time for catching up on your favorite monster movies. I’m looking forward to that remake of Godzilla featuring our former County Executive.

Posted by: sweeneyblog | September 22, 2014

What the heck is I-594 and I-591?

This November, Washington State has an opportunity to speak out about how we handle guns. There are two initiatives on the ballot dealing with gun sales and gun safety – here at the Political Junkie we will be taking a close look at both initiatives over the next week or so.

Initiative 594

The Basics: Sometimes called the “Universal Background Check” effort, this initiative would require a background check when selling a gun to another person, including online sales and at gun shows. This includes filing the proper paperwork, going through a licensed dealer and (obviously) not selling the firearm if they are ineligible to have one. Failure to do so will result in a Class C felony.

I-594

I-594

Exemptions: The initiative also includes a long list of exemptions where a background check is not required. This includes:

  • a gift between family members (including inheritance)
  • antique firearms
  • anything involving a law enforcement officer transferring a weapon as part of their duties
  • lending a firearm in life and death situations for self-defense
  • borrowing a friend’s firearm at a shooting range or gun competition
  • between spouses or domestic partners
  • while legally hunting

Setting aside those situations, a background check would be required for the sale or transfer of a firearm if this initiative passes.

Who: The organization supporting this initiative is the “Washington Alliance for Gun Responsibility” and it has been endorsed by a variety of healthcare, and social action groups (including the Washington League of Women Voters and WA National Association of Mental Illness). It is financially supported by Bill and Melinda Gates, Paul Allen, and Steve Balmer.

 Initiative 591

The Basics: This initiative, aimed at protecting “Gun Rights”, is an effort to forbid the government’s ability to regulate firearms. It would do two things:

  • Make it illegal for law enforcement to confiscate a firearm without due process

    I-591

    I-591

  • Forbid any government agency from requiring a background check unless it is required by federal law

Yes, for those following along at home, this initiative would cancel out Initiative 594 if it passes. Or at least give the Supreme Court something to consider rather than whether or not to arrest the entire state legislature.

Exemptions: This initiative does not have any exemptions, just one last section that says if one part of it is struck down, the rest is still valid.

Who: Aside from the usual collection of gun enthusiast organizations, this bill is also supported by the Washington Council of Police and Sheriff’s which includes Whatcom County Deputy Sheriff’s association and the Bellingham Police Guild. It is financially supported by the Washington Arms Collectors and 2nd amendment groups.

Later this week, we will take a closer look at the rhetoric used by both sides of this debate.

Posted by: sweeneyblog | September 19, 2014

Friday Odds and Ends: Media, Scots and Crawford

Hello Loyal Readers,

It is time for your favorite feature, the Friday Odds and Ends: all the news that’s fit to print, but not big enough to justify a whole post.

First story, our local defenders of democracy, the League of Women Voters has conducted a study which assessed the availability and accessibility of digital information in Whatcom County. They will be presenting the findings from this study, as well as sharing a presentation from Dean Wright and Joan Connell about the evolution of information, at the Bellingham Public Library this Saturday from 10 a.m. – noon. There will be a post-program event from 12:00-12:30.  At this post-program, those in attendance can receive technology coaching to learn how to better access digital information, see you there!

The greatest British hero (pictured below) may have recently become Scottish, but Scotland itself will remain part of Great Britain. As a member of a former colony of Great Britain, I cheered for independence but no such luck.

The Doctor observes the results

crawford

Sam Crawford

What I found interesting was the turnout. Reports show 84-86% of registered voters participated in this vote. Think about that for a moment. In the last hundred years, the best we’ve been able to get is just shy of 63% turnout. What issue could possibly motivate four out of every five American voters to turn in their ballots? If we had that level of involvement, how would that change our political system? Thoughts to consider.

Finally, I saw a letter to the editor in the Herald recently from County Councilman Sam Crawford praising Sen. Doug Ericksen. I thought, what a better advocate for the embattled Senator under pressure for taking over $200,000 of corporate cash than the County Councilman who took $60,000 in corporate cash to buy the county council in 2009? While Ericksen hasn’t been caught deleting evidence, he still is plagued by similar ethical issues.

That’s it for today, onward to the weekend!

Posted by: sweeneyblog | September 15, 2014

Supreme Court Barely Avoids Arresting State Legislature

WA Supreme Court

WA Supreme Court

Our state Supreme Court, for the first time in history, held our legislature in contempt for failing to fully fund education. Frequent readers of this blog knew this was coming after the state Senate Republicans blocked the Democratic education bills that closed tax giveaways to fund our schools.

Because our legislature has failed in its paramount duty (as outlined in our state constitution) the Supreme Court is holding them in contempt.

So what does that mean? Conceivably, it means the legislators themselves could be arrested, sanctioned or forced to work an extra session to resolve the issue. In practice, it sets up a constitutional crisis – what happens when one branch of our government levies sanctions on another? The results could be ugly but the court is willing to forestall any draconian measures until after this next session (2015). In essence, the court said, “You have one more chance to do this right.”

Rep. Vincent Buys

Rep. Vincent Buys

Some legislators believe the Supreme Court should have no authority over them. When the court first issued the warning that legislators were not doing their job to fund education, Rep. Vincent Buys shot back with a fiery letter, warning them, “not continue to perpetuate a constitutional crisis by insisting on violating the very constitution every member of the court has sworn, by oath, to uphold. It is a crisis in which you will not prevail.” Buys continued that this was an “unwarranted extension of judicial authority.”

What the court is asking is not unreasonable. Our schools have been chronically underfunded from the state which has shifted the tax burden to local communities, forcing small town school districts to raise property taxes to cover basic operating costs. While this may work in, say, Bellevue or Mercer Island, where there is plenty of property tax money to be raised, it hits our rural communities much harder, leaving them with dilapidated schools and swelling class sizes.

The court demanding that we fund our schools may be “violating the very constitution” according to Buys, but from where I’m standing, it sounds like a good idea. Perhaps, rather than thumping their chests, our legislators should try passing legislation to fund our schools. Or they may end up with a much scarier result at the end of 2015.

Posted by: sweeneyblog | September 12, 2014

Friday Odds and Ends: Stumbles, Steals and Salaries

First of all, two whole weeks without an Odds and Ends? RIOTS IN THE STREETS! Don’t worry, this lovely feature was just put on hold while I sorted out the busy season of my day job. With work back to a manageable level, we are back at full power and ready to tackle all the news that’s fit to print.

County Executive Jack Louws announced his appointments for the Salary Commission. You may remember the Salary commission was an attempt to examine how much we are paying our elected county officials and to make recommendations in time for the Charter Review commission. Naturally, I scoured the list of nominees to the Salary commission for any evidence of nefarious appointments.

And was sadly disappointed. Just a standard bunch of community advocates, HR professionals and even a labor representative (Hi, Al Jensen!). Nothing to report.

On the other end of the scandal meter, Republican candidate Pedro Celis is in some hot water for plagiarizing the tea party candidate who bumped off Eric Cantor. Celis, after struggling to even make it through the primary, hired a new consultant to shake up his website. The result, the new consultant copied and pasted who paragraphs from his previous work and slapped them up on Celis’ site.

It is no secret that political consultants reuse old campaign themes, for instance local strategist Lisa McShane often urges her candidates to focus on clean drinking water since it is, you know, rather important to most people here. However, usually the candidate puts their own voice into the issue rather than lifting whole reams of text. Disappointing move from a campaign already on life-support.

Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R)

Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R)

Speaking of Republican woes (side note: “Speaking of Republican Woes” would make a great alternate title for this blog), Cathy McMorris-Rodgers, Republican Congresswoman from Eastern Washington, is fighting some significant ethics investigations. This story started to develop when a disgruntled staffer left her office and revealed that her congressional office had been using public resources for campaign activities, a big violation of the Hatch Act.

McMorris-Rodgers, who received national attention this year when she was chosen to offer the blandest response to a state of the union address since Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid tried to do a duet in 2005. She is a senior member of the house leadership and these allegations could prove a stumbling block for future political aspirations.

Lastly, I would like to offer a brand new award for “Best. Comment. Ever.” to Wendy Harris who managed to make me spew my coffee all over my laptop. In my recent post about filling the remainder of Cathy Lehman’s term, Harris offered her own satirical platform for office:

I intend to use my elected status Vegas style. What is the point of filling wetlands, destroying habitat, killing wildlife, cutting down trees, and increasing impervious surface unless you are getting rich? Destroying our future to allow developers to get rich is dumb. I am running on a corruption and greed platform, because finally, city policies will make sense. I suggest that developers start getting their checkbook out.

Oh, yeah, one more point for my platform… F_ _k the Lake.

Thank you, Wendy, for making my day. As the great philosophers of our generation stated in the sacred volumes of our age,

Posted by: sweeneyblog | September 9, 2014

Who Will Be Appointed to Lehman’s City Council Seat?

There are a great deal of rumors flying around about who will be appointed to fill out the remainder of Cathy Lehman’s term on the city council. The basics are this: the person is chosen by the city council in Dec/Jan, they will serve from January till the end of 2015. During this time, they will almost immediately have to start running for reelection, since that seat is up in November of 2015. The council must come to an agreement within 30 days or the mayor will get to make the appointment.

City Hall

City Hall

When I asked the council members what they are looking for in a candidate, most said variations on the same themes. “Independent thinker”, “ready from day one” and “willing to ask questions”. The council has grappled with how to best provide oversight for the strong mayor’s office – a fact of which the council members are very aware. However, most of the people I spoke with said that appointing a “caretaker” to the position, someone who would merely fill out the last year and not run for reelection, is very unlikely.

Gender is also brought up as a key factor. With the total number of women on the council dwindling down to two, many political movers and shakers I spoke with expressed an interest in appointing a qualified and capable woman to maintain some semblance of balance.

When it comes to naming names, the councilmembers themselves have been rather tight-lipped about who is interested, although most agreed that they would rather come to an agreement rather than have the decision default to Mayor Linville.

Working with my friend and fellow blogger John Servais of NWCitizen, I have compiled a list of some of the rumored candidates. I generally try to avoid rumors and speculation on this blog but because of the nature of this appointment, I believe this these smoky room discussion should be dragged into the light.

Without further ado, here are some of the people who we have heard mentioned as potential candidates for Lehman’s seat:

Bill Geyer
Larry Farr
Doug Starcher
Dan McShane
Alexandra Wiley
Rebecca Johnson
Arlene Feld
Jim Bjerke
Kate Blystone
Wendy Harris
Cerise Noah
Clayton Petree

Roxanne Murphy, currently the At Large Rep

Roxanne Murphy, currently the At Large Rep

Now some of you may be going, “Waitaminute Riley, those people don’t all live in the 3rd Ward!”. That’s because the most likely person to be appointed to Lehman’s seat in the 3rd Ward is . . . Roxanne Murphy, currently serving as the “At-Large” representative. Murphy actually lives in the 3rd ward and would be eager not to run for reelection every two years. This would allow the council to draw from a larger pool of potential applicants for the appointment.

If you feel comfortable adding to the list or crossing your own name off the list, feel free to comment below or send me an email here.

Servais here.  The above was written by Riley and he covered it well.  Over the past few weeks we have both reached out to political players to learn who is in the running.  The nature of political reporting is the sources are strictly the politicians and operatives who purposely give out false info in hopes of advancing their cause, as well as giving out true information but only to those who might futher the cause.  Political watching is not a verifiable process and we all need to take this information with a touch of skepticism.

We share a desire to inform the public so more citizens can participate in the process.  With this information. you can ask specific questions of your council reps and express your approval or concern about specific possible appointees.  More citizens can participate – and that is something the powerful local political operatives do not want as it weakens their power.  We run our websites to inform citizens and voters.

There may be other persons being considered.  If you hear of one, let one of us know and we will check it out.  This appointment is very important to city council decisions in 2015.  Over the next two years we will probably see at least 3 and probably 4 council seats change.  Our council is in a time of more quick changes than perhaps in the past several decades.  All six remaining council members have an obligation to listen to the hopes and concerns of any citizen on this issue of appointing a 7th council member.   This is a city wide issue, not just a 3rd Ward issue.  This is not just for the six council members to quietly form up a secret concensus and drop it on us on January 5.  And so Riley and I bring you this information.

Let us not be surprised on January 5.  This appointment will be someone who is supposed to represent all of us.  Share what you may know with us.

As promised in my examination of Sen. Doug Ericksen’s fundraising yesterday, it is only fair that I take a look at Seth Fleetwood’s donations. As a whole, Fleetwood has raised $154,000 compared to Ericksen’s $230,000 but the differences run deeper than that.

Examining Fleetwood’s public disclosure records is more labor-intensive, mainly because he has far more small donors (over 1,000 donors so far, with over 800 at the $200 or less level) and the big donors happen to be people, rather than organizations. However, there are definitely some trends – here are all the details:

  • $1,900 from the WA Trial Lawyers association
  • $3,350 from local Tribes
  • $5,000 from education groups (students and teachers)
  • $7,600 from statewide progressive groups (i.e. FUSE, Washington Conservation Voters, etc)
  • $17,675 raised from unions across the state (some local, some state-wide)
  • $119,170 from individual donors
fleetwood donations copy

Seth Fleetwood Donations

That’s a pretty lopsided chart. Removing the organizations and just looking at individual donations, 82.1% come from Whatcom County with the remaining 16.9% coming mainly from Seattle. Large donors include local other elected officials such as Rud Browne, Rep. Kris Lytton and of course, Sen. Kevin Ranker.

As much as I hate the cliche, this looks like a people-powered campaign funded by small donors eager to see Ericksen’s ethically-challenged political career come to an end.

 

Posted by: sweeneyblog | August 31, 2014

Sen. Doug Ericksen Raises over $230,000 to fend off Fleetwood

Looking at the primary results, you may think that Sen. Doug Ericksen could comfortably walk to election day. His fundraising record, however, shows that he is in for the fight of his political life. Ericksen has already raised over$230,000 for his reelection campaign, with over $155,275 of that coming from out-of-town special interests.

Here is a sampling of the money coming in. I did my best to break them down by industry, although some companies (i.e. Boeing) are so broad I simply filed them as “business interests.” I also removed any locals (i.e. Brooks Manufacturing) from consideration to illustrate the amount of special interest money coming in.

  • $2,150 from the gun lobby
  • $5,900 from organizations associated with the Gateway Pacific Terminal project
  • $8,250 from the banking and financial industry
  • $9,850 from telecommunication companies
  • $10,850 from pharmaceutical companies
  • $14,950 from the farm, food and beverage industry
  • $18,650 from the energy companies
  • $21,700 from the building and construction industry
  • $23,850 from insurance companies
  • $38,125 from general business interests

Or to look at it another way, here is an simple pie chart that you can share on facebook showing his corporate donations.

Ericksen Donations

Ericksen Donations

Where is he spending all this special interest money? He bought a couple of computers for his campaign, and placed ads in the Lynden Tribune, KGMI, Praise 106.5 and the Lynden Fair. He is paying Ben O’Brine to manage his campaign and Melodie Kirk to doorbell for him. He covered some conference costs (hotels, travel expenses, plane tickets) but beyond that, it is the usual costs of yard signs, printed materials and food and rentals for fundraisers.

 

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 351 other followers