Posted by: sweeneyblog | April 25, 2013

An Interview with Michael Lilliquist

Despite holding elected office for four years, City Councilman Michael Lilliquist is still filled with the idealism of a young candidate. “I still believe enough in people’s goodheartedness that if you give them the information about issues, they will make the right decision about city issues.”

Michael Lilliquist . . . and some poodles schnoodles

Lilliquist was elected in 2009 from the 6th Ward  and has never been shy about sharing his thoughts with the public. Before we even get to the usual battery of questions, Lilliquist is expounding on the contradiction of public service. “Public service is full of contradictions. You have to be an idealist and practical. You are elected to lead but also to represent. You need to be impatient and insist that things need to be done faster, but on the other hand, one of the best assets you can have is patience. You have to realize that it will take a few years to see things happen. You have to act with a sense of urgency and still have the patience of a Buddha.”

So why are you running for reelection? “I really like what I do. There are 281 cities in Washington, when I go to the Association of Washington Cities, everyone loves their city. Well, I have an unreasonable love for our city. We have just the right mix here. There’s some weird stroke of luck that this is the cool city where I live. I get to bask in the reflected glory of the coolness of Bellingham. I just lucked out.”

What would you describe as your biggest accomplishment of the last four years? “How can you quantify that?” He cracks a big smile. I clarify, what are you most proud of? “I know it is a cliche, but Lake Whatcom. Even before I was elected, I was on the Citizen’s Technical Review Task Force. I went through all the science and we identified all the actions to take on the lake. One of those actions was stormwater treatment, that’s what we needed to do and we hadn’t been doing. We’ve done lots of preservation but not enough was being done on restoration. So I helped increase the surcharge on water and then we expanded the allowable scope of uses so that we can spend it on stormwater filtration. As a result, we just began purchasing land for a stormwater filtration facility. It is a four-year long story and I’m only halfway through it, but this is more than just talk talk talk, it is action. It is addressing a missing piece of the puzzle and I am proud of filling that gap.”

Lilliquist

Lilliquist

What are your priorities for a new term? “I hate to say more of the same, but we have to keep moving all these things forward. We have identified that we have neglected repairing our infrastructure, so now we are spending more money on resurfacing our arterials which  keeps our economy moving. There is more to be done with transit, shifting to non-motorized transportation which is  more favorable toward new ways of living.” Now he is really getting rolling, ticking off his projects one by one.

“We are also building a new $50 million sewer treatment plant and must come up with a new rate structure to cover that. I’ve been pushing for reform for our impact fee systems, so that it is no longer so easy to do sprawl, but benefits developers who are doing the right things. Now, are all those issues more or less important than Lake Whatcom? I can’t say.” He takes a moment to collect his thoughts.

“In a sense, city government will succeed when our citizens think not at all about it. When people never have to question what is going on, when they never have to worry that their priorities are taken care of, when things work the way they are supposed to work, that is when we have succeeded.” With that rather philosophical point, I segue our discussion towards some of the upcoming hot button issues.

Once again, the city is discussing a fireworks ban but Lilliquist is unsure how he feels about it. “I haven’t made up my mind about it. This comes to me without much public discussion. It is clear to me that we have a problem with enforcement, if we could find a way to adequately enforce the laws on the books, then we don’t need new laws. Are our current laws enforceable or are we asking our police to do an impossible task? I can’t make that determination until I’ve received more information.

What about the pressing issue of rental safety? “Right now, that industry oversees millions of dollars flowing through our economy and it clearly lacks enough oversight. Unfortunately the remedies are expensive and cumbersome, the only way to resolve a dispute right now is to take them to court. Too often that is the worst of possible situations.” He believes that we don’t need any changes in our code requirements, we just need a way to enforce the rules we have on the books. “One alternative, would be to have them get a business license, that’s the shape of my thinking on this. I hope we get a common understanding on this, it is not about old regulations. It is about how do we provide the resources for enforcement.”

How does Lilliquist feel about the impending Gateway Pacific Project? “It is, and will continue to be, a contentious issue in our community, it has the potential to have such long-term consequences, and our public officials are best when they are thinking long-term. The amount of emotional attention and energy spent on this issue is completely appropriate. I know people would like us to take a position against, but our duty is protecting the long-term interests of Bellingham and we need to be best positioned to influence the process. Our emphasis is that the rules and laws are followed and the proper information is presented. When that happens, we will receive the best possible outcome.”

WCV put Lilliquist in an awkward position

Lilliquist has been a councilman during two mayors: Kelli Linville and Dan Pike. I ask him, as a Pike supporter, how he feels about Linville’s performance as mayor. He immediately contests that he was a Pike supporter. “I told Dan that I would stay officially neutral, I thought it would be unproductive to have a sitting councilman picking a side, however I supported the candidates supported by Whatcom Conservation Voters and they endorsed Pike, so I was an awkward position.”

However, in terms of differences between the two mayors, he argues that the changes have been minor. “There’s been dozens of small changes, but in the grand scheme of things, I haven’t seen much change. The city is largely run by professional employees, the role of the mayor as CEO of the city only affects those people who directly report to her.”

See below for Michael’s expanded thoughts on the role of the mayor.

Speaking of Linville, Lilliquist shared a story of him putting pressure on her over a parking commission for Fairhaven. “It was clear we needed a citizen’s task force on parking in Fairhaven. I secured an informal promise that we do it before the end of the year from Kelli. Well, Kelli came back to me and said we are working on it, we will have representatives from various stakeholders on this committee. I said, ‘No no, we need to have it be a public committee.’ She heard that right away and now we have a good compromise process.”

Shifting gears to the more political side of things, Lilliquist was excited to offer a response to Rep. Overstreet’s Constitution waving this weekend. “See right here on my phone, I have a Constitution app. It has the Constitution AND the Declaration of Independence, and I carry that with me at all times. Ha!”

He says he is not sure whether or not he will have a difficult campaign, he has yet to hire a campaign manager or draw a declared opponent, but he is holding a kickoff this Friday at 5pm, but he is not eager to begin. “I would prefer to be able to spend a few more months being just a city councilmember and not a candidate.”

He also wanted to convey his excitement over the “Walk a Mile in Her Shoes event the Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Services  of Whatcom County is holding this Saturday. Lilliquist is on the board of DVSAS and will be wearing “sensible” heels for the event. “I’ll be wearing shoes I would not mind my daughter wearing.”

Posted by: sweeneyblog | April 24, 2013

An Interview with Bill Knutzen

Recently, I sat down with Bill Knutzen, the affable yet stalwart conservative on the Whatcom County Council. He spoke at the Freedom Academy training I attended and after a few moments of reminiscing about the fun times there, we jumped right into the interview.

Bill Knutzen2

Bill Knutzen

I started with the obvious, why are you running for reelection? “Because I’m a sadist. Is that the right term? I’m not really into that,” he chuckles. “But seriously, agriculture was the reason I ran four years ago and it is the reason I’m running today.” He talked about his time growing up on a farm and how things have changed. “More and more, it is difficult for farmers to be farmers. We need to make sure that farmers have water rights and water quality.”

He blames government bureaucracy for the challenges that farmers face. “There are a lot of different agencies that think they are the governing body on water. Now, I like the work that the Conservation District has done; they’ve done a good job of working with the farmers so there isn’t this heavy hand of government.”

Naturally, the big issue casting a long black shadow over this race is the potential terminal at Cherry Point. I asked him his take on the issue. “I have been trying to avoid that issue at all costs!” He mentioned that the council had been advised (poorly, in my opinion) not to discuss the project and he is holding to that.

Another key issue this year is the construction of a new jail. In light of plummeting crime rates and the recent legalization of marijuana, do we really need a giant 700 bed jail the Sheriff is proposing, or a more reasonable 500 bed jail? “Like most things, you are going to meet some place in the middle. I just want to make sure that the construction is something we can afford.” He also pointed out we can reduce the burden on our jail system by supporting mental health services. “Whatcom has been pretty proactive about mental health services, and I’d like to see that continue.”

What about protecting Lake Whatcom? Knutzen believes the key is more cooperation. “The county has done a good job dealing with developers around the lake.” However, he has some strong words about the Reconveyance. “It is a crapshoot! The cost for those trails is going to be way higher; there were a lot of misconceptions about that deal.” I asked him if he believed the Whatcom Excavator-pushed conspiracy theories about the Reconveyance. He paused, “I was upset by some of those emails that came out. I’m just going to leave it at that.”

I asked him about the changing of the guard at the city and county level. “With Jack (Louws), I haven’t seen a ton of change.” He noted that Dewey Dessler, Pete Kremen’s former right hand man, is still there, deeply involved in county business. But he looks forward to seeing some improvements in the permit process. On the city level, he described Mayor Linville as “a refreshing change, to say the least. Kelli always returns my calls, and that didn’t used to happen.”

The other issue that got Knutzen fired up was the continued fight over the Growth Management Act. “We should have taken the original act to court. You know that there are property owners on the Guide that bought land and now can’t run their businesses because now the state has decided it is rural land. It is wrong and a taking!”

I asked if he is concerned about the mounting cost to the county because of their lawbreaking. “I’m more concerned about the cost to the people than to the county!”

Issues aside, Knutzen is bracing himself for another tough election cycle. Rud Browne, local entrepreneur and environmentalist recently held a high-profile kickoff. Knutzen, on the other hand, has yet to hire a campaign manager. “Will this election be tough? They are all tough, especially if I have a primary. I thought the last one was tough, but I’m proud of my record and in the end, it is up to the voters.”

As we wrapped up our interview, he mentioned that he approaches his role on the County Council using “H.A.T.” Seeing my confused expression, he explains, “Humble, Accountable and True to my principles.” He gives me a big Knutzen grin and saunters off toward the County Courthouse.

I plan to interview all the candidates for public office this year, you can find my previous interviews here

Posted by: sweeneyblog | April 22, 2013

Freedom Academy Comes to Whatcom County

Rep. Jason Overstreet  stared right at me from the stage at the Rome Grange as he waved his Constitution in the air. “Hack job bloggers, these pseudo journalists working for these pseudo journalist corporations; they have mocked my love for the founding documents. There is even one, right here in this room, that has mocked it as ‘Leprechaun Economics‘!” The crowd harrumphed as Overstreet continued. “Applying the timeless truths in this document . . .” again, more Constitution waving, “. . . will get you mocked by the media.” The crowd erupted with a defiant roar and Overstreet smiled as he passed the microphone over to the next speaker.

I am beginning to wonder if coming to Freedom Academy was such a good idea.

It started two weeks ago when a friend forwarded me an invitation. The Whatcom Tea Party, Whatcom Republicans, Northwest Business Club and the Citizens Alliance for Property Rights were sponsoring a training right here in Whatcom County for activists who wanted to run for local office. Curious, I paid my $25 and bought a ticket. Wanting to keep a low profile, I shaved my usual scruffy beard, put on one of my American flag t-shirts, and borrowed an Armed Citizens Legal Defense Network baseball cap.

Trying to keep a low profile

Trying to keep a low profile

I was ID-ed the moment I stepped out of the car. Michelle Luke, chair of the planning commission and candidate for County Council was just arriving. “Hi Riley!” She asked if I had a seatmate and when I said no, we picked out a couple of chairs next to each other. Inside the Rome Grange, there was the usual milieu of conservative movers and shakers. Greg Brown and Ellen Baker of Whatcom Excavator, Elliot Fine and Randy Elmore of the Northwest Business Club, Dave Onkles and Chet Dow of the Whatcom Republicans, Lorraine Newman of the Whatcom Tea Party.

The training was provided by the Freedom Foundation. Based out of Olympia, they are a think tank doing outreach for conservatives in Washington state. Our speakers, Glenn Morgan and Scott Roberts, both were involved in elections in Thurston County and brought some great personal insights to the training. They clarified that they weren’t funded by “the Koch brothers or Wal-mart, but if anyone knows them, we’d love to get in touch!”

Glenn Morgan and Scott Roberts

Glenn Morgan and Scott Roberts

They opened their presentation with this video, talking about how liberals want the country to fail and the only way to save it is to return to conservative principles. They continued to build this sense of dread, “I used to believe that freedom is inevitable, yet in the last five to ten years I have begun to doubt that,” testified Roberts. However, Morgan and Roberts were very focused on their goal of electing conservatives to local office. “Local government is the one government that you can change the easiest and the quickest,” said Morgan. “Today’s school board members are tomorrow’s legislators.”

I have to say, their advice was really good. They pointed out that there are 8,000 elected positions in Washington state and if you want to get involved in politics, don’t jump straight to running for state Legislature, start somewhere smaller. Run for a public utility district or assessor or city council. They recommended the tried and true techniques: “Doorbell, doorbell and then, when you are tired of doorbelling, doorbell some more,” said Morgan. They recommended talking to people you disagree with, going to Democratic Central Committee meetings and union endorsement interviews. “Preaching to the choir is the path to oblivion,” said Roberts, obviously not a Tom Cruise fan.

They also imparted an important bit of messaging advice, “Stay away from conspiracy theories!” Morgan was quite adamant on this point. “Conspiracy theories are not helpful, especially on our side. They don’t build credibility.” Roberts suggested staying positive. “Don’t be angry all the time. If you are a bitter critter, people won’t want to talk to you.” I was relieved to see professional conservative organizations trying to turn their base away from the Andrew Breitbart-style black-helicopter-and-UN-secret-treaty-fears of the last couple of years.

Glenn Morgan

Glenn Morgan

Morgan and Roberts both hit the on the important concept of emotionally connecting with your audience, rather than just listing complaints. “The conservative movement tends to be really fact-based; we need to inspire people more,” Roberts admonished. They came down against big consultants for local races. “You don’t need some fancy consultant for your school board race. Maybe later, when you are running for Congress, but for a city council race, all you need is a good treasurer and some volunteers.”

Overall, the first half was solid, almost bipartisan information. Really, it was no different than the advice I’ve heard or given to candidates running for local office. Beware the time commitment, be a people person, always stay friendly and open, communicate on values and local issues. Really solid stuff. I was genuinely impressed, this was great information for anyone to have and I was pleasantly relieved to find it so . . . non-controversial. As I talked during the break with various attendees, most of them were open and receptive, curious why I was there, but never confrontational. Most of them were just surprised I had decided to attend. As I left for lunch, I thought to myself, “This isn’t too bad, maybe I misjudged the local conservatives, these guys seem perfectly reasonable.”

And then Rep. Jason Overstreet arrived. 

bill

Bill Knutzen

After lunch, they held a candidate forum, where local elected officials spoke to the group about their experiences running for office. County Councilman Bill Knutzen, Ferndale School Board Member Hugh Foulke and Rep. Overstreet all arrived to share their thoughts. All three of them spoke quite eloquently about what led them to get involved and some of the challenges they faced. “When I gave my first public speech, I was terrified,” said Knutzen. “I had sweat running out of every orifice except for my mouth because it was so dry I couldn’t move my tongue. I’m pretty sure I just blacked out and didn’t remember a single thing I said.” Michelle Luke nodded sagely and whispered to me, “I can relate.”

All three of them talked about facing criticism from the outside. Knutzen said when he first ran, “One Bellingham publication linked me to Al Qaeda and another said that we should worry because I was too stupid to find the courthouse. Well, don’t worry, I found it.”

Rep. Jason Overstreet

Rep. Jason Overstreet

When Overstreet stepped up to speak, I pulled my camera out of my pocket to take a picture and he immediately called me out. “I’m going to let Riley take his picture before I start. Okay . . .” He paused for a moment and then launched right into that tirade against yours truly. “You can sit in the cheap seats and be a hit man blogger with inaccuracies, but it is a much different thing when you step in and actually say what you believe.” After a bit of this, he then got back to the subject at hand. Before long, they opened it up for questions.

The first question was about how to cope with the pressures of elected office. Jason Overstreet paused before answering and his wife, Jessica Overstreet, leaped right up and grabbed the microphone to answer for him. “The most difficult part is balancing the time and being used to being under the microscope. If you are going back to Scripture and living under Scripture then living under a microscope isn’t that bad, you don’t have anything to hide.”

This sudden swerve into religion actually startled me  because before this, all the conservative talk had been exclusively about economic issues. Jessica Overstreet continued, “We are here to glorify God forever, that is why we are here. We just have to pick up our cross and we get to it. Be rock solid in your principles!” There was cheers from the audience and the woman behind me shouted, “When are you running for office?” Jessica blushed and handed the microphone back to her husband.

One of the audience members asked Overstreet what he thought about John Stark, reporter at the Herald, “mocking” Overstreet for carrying a Constitution with him everywhere. That’s what set off the rant against me about being a “pseudo journalist” and accusing him of leprechaun economics. It was out-of-place and while he got some definite cheers, the organizers looked more than a little uncomfortable about the direction the discussion was taking.

After a few more questions, I raised my hand and asked how they keep up their enthusiasm for public service. ”I know burnout can be an issue, all three of you have been in office for four years now, how do you keep the fire alive?” Knutzen answered that his family helps keep him grounded and thanked his wife for putting up with all of the demands of office. When the microphone got to Overstreet, he looked at me directly. “Riley, I’m so glad that you wanted to talk about Obama’s warrantless use of drones and indefinite detentions. I’m glad that you want to discuss Obama’s use of those despite that document that John Stark doesn’t want me waving around. I recently sponsored legislation restricting the use of drones and limiting indefinite detentions and some Democrats actually joined me in co-sponsoring that bill. That’s how I keep my passion, finding things that really matter and staying true to my principles.”

As soon as the forum was completed, Michelle Luke turned to me. “Has that ever happened before? Jason, you know, going at you like that?” I shook my head. “Well, it . . . it didn’t really contribute to the discussion,” she said. I agreed and slipped downstairs to grab some water. Knutzen greeted me as I reached the bottom of the stairs. “You notice I didn’t make fun of you,” he said with a big smile.

I can't wait to read, "Barack Obama's Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model."

I can’t wait to read, “Barack Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model.”

The second half of the day was more focused on activism, and here is where things got a little more controversial. At one point, Morgan told a story about doorbelling in Thurston County. “I knocked on this door and this black guy came out and just started yelling at me for twenty minutes. The whole time, I kept a smile on my face. After a while, he stopped and said, ‘You know, I’ve been giving you shit this whole time and you haven’t gotten angry. Come inside and let me write you a check.’ So I did, and I thought he was going to cut me a check for $20, just to apologize, but it ended up being for $200!”

“Was he a drug dealer?” shouted one of the audience members. Morgan winced as the comment drew chuckles from the crowd. “No, I think he was in law enforcement, but that’s not the point.”

Roberts spoke at length about finding corruption in your local government. Naturally, I thought he was going to discuss tax giveaways to local developers, sweetheart land deals, or moonlighting city employees, but I was wrong. “Homelessness grants. Consultants make thousands of dollars off these grants to fight homelessness and don’t do anything with them,” Roberts said. “Also, enviro-grants are the number one source of corruption in Washington state. Check out who is receiving them and how they are using the money.” Other potential sources of graft according to Roberts? The Department of Social and Health Services, municipal debt and non-elected boards and commissions. “Every person touched by government is a potential ally.”

Morgan noted that the internet is a good way to get information out about these issues. “I’m not as negative as Overstreet is about blogging. The internet is where the information is.”

Speaking of information, most of the ticket price must have gone to printing costs. I walked away with several new books to read, from an analysis of Ayn Rand’s writing to “How to Counter Group Manipulation Tactics.” I will be reading them over the next couple of weeks and provide you with any interesting tidbits.

I had to leave about half an hour before Freedom Academy finished, but it was winding down as I slipped out. Aside from Overstreet’s bizarre rant at me and the casual racism, the event was relatively positive with lots of good information for people seeking office. I’m glad I went. And while I don’t support the policy goals of these conservative organizations, I’m always in support of more people getting involved in their government and providing vigorous oversight.

Speaking of which, no amount of Overstreet jeering is going to keep me from bringing you all the details of local political events. If you find what I do helpful, you can email me a news tip, share this blog on facebook or  throw me a few dollars to keep the site running strong.

Posted by: sweeneyblog | April 19, 2013

Friday Odds and Ends: Ninth Order, Candidates, Judges and Ken

Hello Loyal Readers,

This was a busy week for political news, so naturally my Friday Odds and Ends are stuffed, but before I get started, I had a few emails and I wanted to clarify something.

Like many of you, I have been glued to the news from Boston. I choose not to cover those sorts of big stories here at the Political Junkie, not because they aren’t important, but because there are plenty of other and better news sources for that sort of thing. My heart goes out to the people suffering in Boston (here’s how to help), but I know you tune into the Political Junkie to find out the whole story on issues you can’t get anywhere else: in-depth stories about local political news and events.

As this blog continues to evolve, I am working with you, my loyal readers, to fine-tune it to just what you need. If you feel strongly about what I should and shouldn’t be covering, you can always shoot me an email.

Enough meta-discussion, onward to the Odds and Ends.

Majority Leader Rodney Tom

In the state legislature, there has been a ton of activity. Many people across the state were frustrated that two key bills, the Reproductive Parity Act (RPA) and the state DREAM Act both died in committee. What happened was that Democratic turncoat made majority leader Rodney Tom had promised to support both bills, however he referred them to committees chaired by conservative Republicans who refused to let them escape (similar to what Doug Ericksen did to the Toxics bill). Rodney Tom has the power to bring up for vote on the Senate floor any bill that is in committee, but he has chosen not to, even though there are enough votes for final passage.

Kevin Ranker, in an interview with The Political Junkie, mentioned that the Senate Republicans elected the Tom as their majority leader with a very specific condition. “Part of the bargain for the Republican control of the Senate was ‘no positive women’s health bills off the floor.” Some have speculated that Tom refuses to bring up the RPA for fear of losing his position as majority chair.

Either way, the Democrats tried to force the issue by using a procedural move called “Ninth Order,” which allows bills to be pulled directly from committee to the floor. It is the same maneuver the Republicans and Tom used last session that allowed them to pass the Republican budget. Tom, despite claiming he supports the DREAM Act and RPA, voted against that move too, denying millions of vulnerable women and immigrants the choices and resources they need.

Doug Ericksen

Sen. Doug Ericksen

In the weird news category, Sen. Doug Ericksen asked for a floor vote on the Toxic Toys bill which would ban dangerous chemicals in furniture, children’s toys and mattresses. Why is this weird? As I mentioned above, Sen. Ericksen illegally shut down a vote on that bill in his committee earlier this year. Now, he wants the Rules Committee to bring it up for a vote. Why now? In the intervening time, he gutted the bill so that it only applies to two chemicals and only to children’s toys. When asked about it, he responded with his usual tact and charm saying that the Democrats will pass it. “Do they want to ban these two chemicals or not?”

In more local news, it has been launch week for several candidates. Michelle Luke declared her intention for a rematch against Carl Weimer, Bob Burr is challenging Barry Buchanan for the Bellingham City Council At-Large seat, Clayton Petree is seeking the 4th ward against Pinky Vargas, and Rud Browne held a truly impressive kickoff on Thursday night with a wide selection of attendees. Any time you have Bob Pritchett (of Logos Bible Software), Alex Ramel (of Whatcom Conservation Voters), Tony Larson (fmr. Tea Party County Councilmember) and Lisa McShane (does she need a parenthetical description?) at the same kickoff, you know the other guy is in trouble. That said, I’m interviewing the other guy, Bill Knutzen, next week. So stay tuned.

Remember how I mentioned the State Republicans were auctioning off an assault weapon? Here’s the footage.

Deborra Garrett for Superior Court Judge

Deborra Garrett, the one person not considering the new judicial vacancy

It looks like Whatcom County will be getting a fourth Superior Court Judge. Thanks to efforts by most of our delegates from the 40th and 42nd, we will be getting some funding (the state splits the bill with the county on this one) for a fourth judge. Naturally, this will trigger an election in 2014 for an open seat. Last time there was an open seat, it created a very interesting race between David Grant, Carrie Coppinger Carter, and the eventual victor, Deborra Garrett. After some investigation (and thank you to Katie Drewel, Rep. Lytton’s Legislative Aide, for her excellent constituent service in helping me track down the answer) I was able to uncover that the governor will appoint the judge in the interim. Let the judicial speculation begin!

Finally, long-time Bellingham Chamber of Commerce President Ken Oplinger has accepted a job down in Santa Monica Barbara, CA and will be leaving his post after Ski to Sea. I spoke with him briefly about the future of the Chamber. He said the Board of Directors will meet and perhaps appoint an interim director, but there will be a national search for a new president, which should conclude around August.

I realize that was a lot of Odds and Ends. I will have more articles on candidates and a special investigative report over the weekend, so stay tuned. Also, I’ve been getting conflicting feedback about the frequency of posts – how much is too much? So if you wouldn’t mind helping me by clicking and taking this little poll.

Posted by: sweeneyblog | April 16, 2013

County Council Races Begin: Rud and Kathy

With filing week fast approaching, this is the time for everyone to begin their campaigns. In rapid succession, various candidates have announced their candidacy for election or reelection. As I mentioned earlier, this is going to be a fiercely fought campaign and we here at The Political Junkie will do our best to provide you with the best, most in depth coverage available of the Whatcom County Council races.

Rud Browne

First up, entrepreneur Rud Browne declared his run for the At-Large seat against incumbent Bill Knutzen. Rud Browne recently sold the company he built from the ground up, Ryzex, and it is still one of the largest employers in Whatcom County. Browne has been heavily involved in county politics for the last couple of years. He served on the ethics commission that, in 2010, ruled on whether Ward Nelson broke any rules in stonewalling everyone but himself as Bob Kelly’s replacement (confused? Read here). He also lobbied the County Council in support of the reconveyance, drafting a great editorial in the Herald urging approval.

Now he is taking his business acumen and insight to the County Council. His kickoff is tomorrow, from 5:30 p.m. to 7 p.m. in the Mt. Baker Theater Encore Room (around the corner from The Table). I will be there, and hopefully interview Browne about his views at some later date.

Browne, despite the perception about businessmen running for office, totes a long list of Democratic endorsements.

Kathy Kershner's first campaign

Kathy Kershner’s first campaign

On the other side of the spectrum, Republican Kathy Kershner declared that she is running for reelection. No one has declared to run against her yet. In the past two years, she has served as council chair and been at the center of many struggles. She had voiced criticism of the reconveyance in the past and voted several times to delay the decision on it until it was clear it had the votes to pass, then she voted to support it.

Update: Kathy Kershner called me to clarify that she does not remember voting against the Reconveyance at any point, only voting to “give the community more time to look it over”.

Last year, she was a national Republican delegate for Romney and has been heavily involved in Republican party politics for the last four years. She cut an ad endorsing Vincent Buys and did a number of Republican fundraisers. Which is why I was so surprised to see Ralph Schwartz‘ article in the Herald describing her as an “independent-minded Republican.” If I ran for office, with my long record of Democratic party politics, would I be described as an “independent-minded Democrat”?

Aside from the Herald’s unusual choice of headlines, this race has yet to draw a challenger, but in my mind, this will be one of the most interesting races. You can read my long interview I did with Kershner last year here.

In other news, Bill Knutzen and Carl Weimer both declared their run for reelection, as well as Weimer’s former challenger Michelle Luke. I will be profiling them in a couple days.

Last week, I published an article about Sen. Doug Ericksen and Rep. Vincent Buys bill to raise the taxes on Lynden residents by exempting the Lynden Fairgrounds from property taxes. There was some discussion about whether or not the fairground pays taxes so I received a clarification from our level-headed County Treasurer Steve Oliver (emphasis mine).

Hi Riley,

I was reading your blog about this issue.  I’m getting ready to send out about $180,000 in new property tax bills to the fair association this month for 2012 and 2013 property taxes due as a result of the Department of Revenue’s recent determination.  My understanding is that the fair association has appealed this administrative determination and will be heard by the State Board of Tax Appeals at a future date.

County Treasurer Steve Oliver

County Treasurer Steve Oliver

Just as a point of clarification, the fair association has received a tax exemption from the DOR for many, many years prior to this recent change of course.  Effectively, the fair association has never paid property taxes (as long as anyone here can recall) and prior to that from my understanding, the property was mostly owned by the City of Lynden (and possibly the County) which would have exempted the property from taxation as well.

If the property continues to be taxable in the future, in very general terms, it doesn’t create new property tax revenue for the taxing jurisdictions such as the City of Lynden or the Lynden School District.  We have a budget based property tax system in Washington.  The amount of property tax to be collected is fixed by the budget processes of the taxing jurisdictions.  For example, the City of Lynden’s 2013 property tax levy is approximately $2.8 million, which the City Council sets by public action typically as part of their city budget process.  If the City chose to collect the same amount in 2014, the addition of the NWWA Fair’s approximately $9 million in taxable value to the City tax base doesn’t generate one dollar more.  It would however potentially reduce other City property taxpayers’ shares of the City’s property tax levy since the tax base of the City was increased by $9 million.

This is often referred to as a tax shift.  It generally doesn’t affect the amount of property tax revenue that will be collected but it does affect WHO pays the taxes. This isn’t something unique to this particular situation, but can be said about any property tax exemption granted by state law, including low income seniors, low income disabled persons, private schools, other non-profits, churches, publicly owned property,  farm equipment, small business, etc.  All of these property tax exemptions shift the tax burden to those that do pay property taxes.  It has no impact on the AMOUNT of taxes collected in total, but it can impact an individual taxpayer’s share of the total taxes collected.  The remaining taxpayers are paying for all of these exemptions in effect due to the reduced tax base that is left to spread the total property tax burden across.

A good metaphor for how property taxes work is ordering a pizza with your friends. You order a pizza and then everyone throws in whatever cash they have in their pockets. If one of your friends decides he doesn’t chip in, the total price of the pizza doesn’t change, everyone else just has to pay more. That’s what Steve Oliver is talking about with shifting the tax burden.

So to put it quite simply, while the City of Lynden owned and operated the Fair, the profit from the fair provided a huge amount of revenue for the City budget. When it was transferred to the non-profit status in 2012, the City was  no longer able to get profit from the fair, since it was now privately owned. However, it was counting on recouping all that revenue from property taxes, since the fair would now be subject to them. However, Ericksen and Buys are pushing through an exemption which means less revenue for the City and everyone else has to pay more. In short, they are raising taxes on their own constituents.

Baron family donates to Buys campaign

Baron family donates to Buys campaign

Now, I personally don’t have a problem with raising taxes, I’ve voted for lots of people who do that. However, Buys and Ericksen both ran on the platform of never raising taxes, they always rail against tax increases in every speech. In his constituent email he sent out nine days ago, he said that the state budget should, “keep the promise of funding priorities like education and environmental cleanup without relying on tax increases.” Do different rules apply to the Lynden city budget?

One last point, the person who receives this giant tax loophole is Jim Baron, the manager of the Northwest Fairgrounds. Over the three years, his family has donated $900 to Vincent Buys campaigns and $200 to the State Senate Republicans (the group that helps elect Ericksen). Now obviously our representatives are above such considerations, but it is an important fact to consider when evaluating why Ericksen and Buys would be bending over backwards to violate their own stated beliefs and raise taxes on the people of Lynden.

Posted by: sweeneyblog | April 12, 2013

Friday Odds and Ends: Pay Cut, Guns and Gay Flowers

Hello Loyal Readers,

Another week packed full of political news. This Saturday, I will have an article about all the County Council excitement and Monday I have a follow-up on Doug Ericksen’s tax increase on Lynden residents. But for now, all the news that is fit to print.

Suzan Delbene

Suzan Delbene

Suzan Delbene, our new congresswoman from this area joined a host of other Democrats in taking a paycut to show solidarity with those gouged by the sequester. “As hundreds of thousands of federal workers face unpaid furloughs and funding for programs that working families depend on such as Head Start and Meals On Wheels are getting cut, the across-the-board cuts from sequestration are starting to impact people throughout the country. It’s only fair that elected leaders are affected as well,” said DelBene. She will be returning 8.2% of her salary to the U.S. Treasury.

Two weeks ago, I talked about the need for Washington Roundtable, a collection of our top employers, to pony up some of the costs of training their future workforce. John Burbank of the Economic Opportunity Institute penned a topnotch editorial push for a very simple solution: Close some of their tax loopholes.

“Right now, Microsoft enjoys a $20 million “high-tech” sales tax waiver each year. That is about .1 percent of Microsoft profits. The Legislature could close this loophole. Indeed, Microsoft should encourage this. Why? Because that money could fund more students in the STEM college pipeline, and from there right into Microsoft. It is good for the state, it is good for students and it is good for Microsoft,” said Burbank.

Close on the heels of this proposal, the House Democratic budget was released and it included closing fifteen of those tax loopholes. A solid start from the state Democrats.

The Washington State Republicans are holding their annual fundraiser this weekend and what are they auctioning off? An AR-15. You know, the same type of weapon used in most of the large-scale shootings over the last year. Tacky doesn’t even begin to cover it. Also being auctioned off is a lunch with Rob McKenna, well-known for his lively and welcoming demeanor. I wonder which one will raise more money?

Shahram Hadian at the Whatcom GOP Convention

Shahram Hadian at the Whatcom GOP Convention

Finally, our marriage equality law is getting an early legal test thanks to a bigoted florist in Benton County. Baronelle Stutzman, owner of Arlene Flowers, recently refused to provide wedding flowers to two men who were long-time customers of hers because the men were getting married to each other. Our attorney general, Bob Ferguson, indicated he will press a lawsuit to make an example of this case as a clear-cut example of discriminatory practices.

Stutzman contests that arranging flowers is a free-speech expression and that the law could not compel an anti-war activist to compose a pro-war song. Ferguson is contesting that this is more in the line of refusing to serve a customer based on their sexual orientation – which is pretty much the legal definition of discrimination.

No matter how the legal battle shakes out, this will continue to be a media firestorm. Shahram Hadian, ultra-conservative candidate for Governor in 2012, sent out this hair-raising email about the issue.

We must STOP compromising!! While I was travelling around WA State last year working to defend marriage as between one man and one woman, we were warning people that we would begin to see these kinds of lawsuits in our state violating the rights of Christians and business owners who would not support same-sex marriages. Many said we were exaggerating and that this would not happen.

Well, Washington State, here you go. You got what you asked for.

. . .

While many (including some of my Christian friends) voiced their support for “equality” and so called “civil rights” for homosexuals, who was concerned for the civil rights and religious freedom of those who hold a Biblical view of marriage? I am tired of the false tolerance message of those who demand rights for homosexuals but could care less about the rights of those holding to Biblical values. Your hypocrisy is blatant! Our freedoms continue to drop off a cliff more each day! Enough is enough.

Hadian’s rather inflammatory language is just the first broadside in what will be a continued fight. One of the best pieces of advice I ever received was when, as a young man, I had the opportunity to interview Jolene Unsoeld, the former Congresswoman from my hometown of Olympia. She said that it is not enough to simply pass a law. “You  must defend it, because the people who fought you then don’t go away. They work, constantly, to undermine the progress you have made.”

In 2012, we made a great leap forward for equality, but defending it from discriminatory people like Hadian and Stutzman will take a generation.

Tune in this weekend for updates about County Council races and more details on Doug Ericksen’s tax increase on Lynden residents.

Posted by: sweeneyblog | April 9, 2013

An Interview with Kaylee Galloway

Recently, I sat down with Kaylee Galloway, a WWU student running to become the Vice-President of Governmental Affairs for their student organization because I wanted to offer some coverage of that race. Why, you ask? Three reasons:

  • More people vote in the these elections than vote for the mayor of Ferndale. On average, over 3,500 students cast their vote – that is a huge population that is underserved by the media coverage available.
  • It is one of my goals for this blog to highlight young political organizers. Too often, they get stereotyped as ineffective activists, however there are scores of people making a big impact on their community. I wrote about some of them earlier this year.
  • Finally, this race (VP for Gov’t Affairs) is about who will lobby our state representatives, city council members, and the community at-large and their issues are less tied to the campus and to the greater challenges facing young people in our community.

Galloway met me for a brief interview at The Woods late last week. The former Snoqualmie resident is studying Political Science, Philosophy and Economics at Western (it is an actual major!) and decided to run for this job because of a desire to be an advocate for students.“This is something I am extremely passionate about. This is an opportunity to provide students with the resources they need.” She elaborated on how she sees the position. “It is focused on representation and advocacy efforts, it is a multi-dimensional position, a liaison between the community and the associated students on issues that are extremely important to both groups.”

Kaylee Galloway

Kaylee Galloway

Galloway highlighted the main responsibilities as managing Viking Lobby Day (where students try to persuade their legislators to support their agenda) and voter registration. Last year, Western Washington University registered more voters than any other university in the state, a whopping 2,303 voters.

“As our involvement is growing, our organizing and lobbying efforts are growing, and the student influence in politics is evolving. We are becoming more powerful and now recognizing how powerful that is.” She gestures through the rain streaked windows of The Woods Coffee at the Lettered Streets.  ”Students are part of the community, we are all one of the same city. We can confront issues as a unified front.”

As always, pushing for lower tuition is a key priority. “Our focus is for college to be accessible and affordable.” She highlighted the increased burden of debt that comes with our high tuition, high financial aid model. “Again, that’s something that can be worked at a federal level and state level and we need to work on both.”

I asked about one of the issues of vital importance to so many in our community: rental safety. She agreed that it is a critical issue. “Safe housing benefits everyone, not just students. The Associated Students will work with the community on this issue. We are one and the same, WWU is part of the community and the community is part of western.”

What role does Galloway believe partisanship should play in this sort of position? “I do personally identify as a Democrat, but I do believe that there is a time and place to use that partisanship. I do not think that running for the Vice President of Governmental Affairs is an appropriate place to be running on a partisan platform. The Associated Students prides itself on its nonpartisanship, inclusion and diversity, and as soon as you declare and identify as a political party, as soon as you bring a specific voice to the table you are excluding people. The VP’s role is not to focus on party, it is to focus on representing all students.”

“Now I recognize that sometimes it is important to engage with issues that might fall on a party line. The democratic budget might be more in tune with what we are looking for as students,  they might be more generous toward higher education. That’s when it would be appropriate to say that students support a specific partisan approach.”

She cites as credentials some of her experience working within the Associated Students and serving on the executive board of the Washington Student Association. However, she points out that this work isn’t all about lobbying for tuition. “I would hope that people recognize that students are holistic, we have other interests and ideas and topics that we are passionate about beyond higher education.”

I have reached out to Andrew Taylor, who is running for the same position and hope to sit down with him in the next week. In the meantime, I will have a follow-up on Sen. Doug Ericksen’s tax increase on Lynden residents and candidate announcements before the weekend.

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 170 other followers